GPW_AR_2013_Final_v10.pdf
4. Job evaluation
The following table (Table 4.1) summarises the number of jobs that were evaluated during the year under review. The table also provides the statistics on the number of posts that were upgraded or downgraded.
Table 4.1 – Job evaluation
% of upgraded posts evaluated
% of downgraded posts evaluated
Number of jobs evaluated
Number of posts upgraded
Number of posts downgraded
Salary band on 31 March 2012
Number of posts
% of posts evaluated
Lower skilled (Levels 1-2)
24
0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Skilled (Levels 3-5)
384
37
9.6
Highly skilled production (Levels 6-8) Highly skilled supervision (Levels 9-12)
217
4
1.8
0
0
0
0
64
1
1.6
0
0
0
0
Senior management service band A, Senior management service band B Senior management service band C, Senior management service Band D
15
3
20
0
0
0
0
11
2
16.7
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Total
719
47
6.5
8EFPI ¯ 4VS½PI SJ IQTPS]IIW [LSWI TSWMXMSRW [IVI YTKVEHIH HYI XS XLIMV TSWXW FIMRK YTKVEHIH &IRI½GMEVMIW African Asian Coloured White Total Bene ½ ciaries 0 0 0 0 0
Table 4.3 – Employees whose salary level exceed the grade determined by job evaluation [i.t.o PSR 1.V.C.3] Total number of employees whose salaries exceeded the upgrades determined by job evaluation in 2012/2013 None
8EFPI ¯ 4 VS½PI SJ IQTPS]IIW [LSWI WEPEV] PIZIP I\GIIHIH XLI KVEHI HIXIVQMRIH F] NSF IZEPYEXMSR ?M X S 476 : ' A &IRI½GMEVMIW African Asian Coloured White Total Female 0 0 0 0 0 Male 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 Employees with a disability 0 0 0 0 0
105
GPW ANNUAL REPORT 2012 | 2013
Made with FlippingBook Digital Publishing Software